"I am the decisive element. It is my personal approach that creates the climate. It is my daily mood that makes the weather." — Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe
That quote opened our most recent Peak Alliance session on performance management, and it landed exactly the way I intended.
Too often, performance management gets reduced to reviews, ratings, and improvement plans. Leaders treat it as a periodic process rather than an everyday practice. But that framing misses the point entirely.
The best leaders understand that performance management is an ongoing process of setting expectations, coaching behaviors, and reinforcing accountability.
Real performance management happens in the day-to-day moments. The expectations you set, the feedback you give, the behaviors you reinforce, and the things you choose not to address all shape performance over time.
One of my core beliefs is that high performance rarely happens by accident. It is shaped by what leaders design.
In our session, I kept coming back to three things that separate high-performing teams from struggling ones.
Clarity, because people perform better when success is clearly defined.
Support, because people need coaching and reinforcement, not just direction.
Consistency, because when you set an expectation and never inspect it, you have not set an expectation. You have made a suggestion.
When performance is not where it needs to be, I always encourage leaders to look in the mirror before looking at their team.
In the session, we spent a lot of time on what I call the DCOM model. It is a simple diagnostic framework, but it changes how leaders show up to performance conversations.
When someone is underperforming, ask yourself four questions before you decide how to respond.
Have you clearly defined what is expected? Does the person know what success looks like and when they need to get there? Is the gap between where they are and where they need to be actually visible to them?
Do they have the skills to do what is expected? This is not about whether they have done the job before. It is about whether they can do it at the level you need, in the environment they are operating in right now. If they cannot, what specifically needs to be developed?
Is your standard realistic, and do they actually have what they need? Do they have the time, the resources, and the support to succeed? Are there barriers in the way that you could help remove?
Are they willing to do the job? Have you made the stakes clear, reinforced the right behavior, and given them real feedback? What beliefs or consequences might be shaping how they are showing up?
Here is what I tell leaders about this model: the first three are almost entirely on you.
One member in our session had been working through a performance situation for months, convinced it was a motivation issue. When they walked through these questions out loud, they realized they had never actually gotten aligned on what the expected behavior looked like. They had assumed the person knew. They did not.
The conversation they had been putting off was not a motivation conversation at all. That shift changed everything about how they approached it.
When motivation is genuinely part of the picture, leaders often make another mistake. They assume their team is motivated by the same things they are.
I have watched leaders deploy recognition programs, compensation contests, and public leaderboards, only to discover that none of those things moved the needle for certain people on the team. Not because those people are disengaged. Because their motivators are different.
Some people are driven by growth and new challenges. Others are motivated by public recognition. Some want ownership and autonomy.
The leaders who figure this out stop managing to a single motivational template and start paying attention to the individual in front of them.
There is another idea from the session that I think is worth sitting with.
The behaviors that are present on your team are the behaviors you have, at some level, accepted. Maybe you addressed something once and let it go when it did not change. Maybe you never addressed it at all because the person is a top performer in other areas and you did not want the friction.
Whatever the reason, what you tolerate becomes your standard.
This idea can be uncomfortable. None of us likes to think we're contributing to the very problems we're trying to solve. But once leaders recognize the role they play in shaping team behavior, they gain the ability to change it.
Because it means the performance environment on your team is not fixed. It is something you are actively shaping, whether you are doing it intentionally or not.
Performance management is not a process that happens once a year. It is the sum of every conversation, every expectation you set, and every moment you choose to address something or let it go.
That is where the real work is.
The Pivotal Peak Alliance brings together sales and business leaders who value community-based growth and real-world problem solving. Learn more about how our leadership peer community helps leaders navigate challenges, share insights, and achieve lasting success
© Pivotal Advisors, LLC | Privacy Policy
